3/17/2023 0 Comments Protools game audio angry botsThere is no reason to convert unless you want to, REAPER and all other sequencers are just good tools, it depends on what you do. I have LOTS of deadlines and major clients and the workflow and stability has greatly improved my confidence in meeting them compared to when I dealt with Steinberg. Stable and awesome! It took me a couple of months to fully change over from Nuendo/Cubase as I learned the program and how to do everything I needed, but it was worth it. Right now, and for the next ten days, my commercial license version is running the timecode synced playback system for background fireworks music and stage production playback in a major theme park/exhibition that gets over 1.5 million people over the ten days. I do my own private digital studio recording (the semipro license) as well as full on commerical stuff with live recordings of 48 channels at a time as well as live production playbacks. I can't comment on the midi aspects but the audio aspects are tremendous. Every time I think there is something Reaper can't do someone on this forum tells me how to do it or it becomes available in an update within a week or two. I have both a commercial and semi-pro licence in my tiny company and I love it. so even majority web opinions would only be a very, very tiny sampling of the user base.ģ5 years as professional engineer/producer- so went through the analogue, digital, standalone digital recorders, Nuendo/Cubase and now Reaper. Only the people who enjoy that kinda thing and the net in general. It's certainly not the case that the vast majority of any user of any software (and their users opinions) will be found in a web forum. It's the only relevant criteria.Īlso keep in mind that Internet chat is a hobby that some enjoy. Try it (and everything else) and see if it works for you in it's current state based on how you work and what you need. People recording mostly string quartets or gospel choirs for church for instance won't be doing a heck of a lot of the editing that others think is mandatory in a host. Honestly, you can run a professional studio with Garageband and some great plugs. I think there are lots of pros using Reaper but that question or observation doesn't really help you make a decision because, like hobbyists and/or others, "professionals" aren't a static class of identical users who all do the same things with their hosts. Efficiency and reliability are what matter for me. I'm just an end-user who uses computers to make music for a living. 'Cause I don't have time to indulge an interesting hobby sequencer and to spend hours swapping ideas about neat things to implement. So here's my question: is anyone using Reaper (Mac) professionally? I mean like real, getting-paid-to-meet-deadlines professionally. Requests are fulfilled eventually so if you have any idea to improve any area or simply think others' ideas could benefit your workflow, please share it or support it voting in the Issue Tracker (), don't worry it won't take more than 10 minutes to find and vote for a suggestion there ) People are really helpful around here so please don't hesitate if you have any doubt.Ĭommunication with Reaper's developers is fluent here, bugs are fixed regularly (sometimes users jumped in if they can help somehow). Read the User Guide (), install extensions () and do some searches here to find useful tips and tricks according to your criteria. I've spent a lot of time configuring it and setting options up (and I'm still learning) but it does worth that time because once you've mastered it you'll be able to complete those deadlines successfully just like some of us do (clients have never complained here, I always get the job done). My advice is, install it and take some time to learn its differences and/or similarities with Digital Performer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |